Post by Codi on Jul 10, 2011 4:45:21 GMT
So at Izzie's pre-op check up the vet was concerned about how much smaller she was than her litter mate, Bella. If I didn't have Bella, I am sure the vet wouldn't blink an eye at her size, but since they are sisters and almost 3 lbs difference in size, it raises some eyebrows. The vet was concerned about her maybe having a liver shunt or something, (also Hydrocephalus, which I know she doesn't have) despite having normal blood work. But she has no signs of anything like that.
I talked to the "breeder" and found out the birth order size-
1.The smallest died, 2. Tinkerbell, 3. Izzie, 4. Junior, 5. Bronco, 6. Bella, then 7. Little Bear. (smallest to biggest)
Well I got in contact with the person that owns Tinkerbell because I thought if I could tell the vet and other ppl that the smallest of the litter is still smallest, they wouldn't be so concerned. But she is now at 4 lbs. Izzie is still 3.4 lbs, but she is pretty skinny. Is that okay? That the technical runt, or the 2nd runt, of the litter has now outgrown her? I don't know if Tinkerbell is overweight or anything though, so you never know about that. But the vet visit made me all freaked out, no one has ever raised concerns like that about Izzie.
I think that since the parents were just so different, dad was about 4 lbs and mom is about 6 lbs, that the pups in the litter are going to have a big variation in size. Since I got 2 opposite ends with the litter when it comes to size, the difference seems more drastic.
Mainly what I wanna know, is if this is okay and normal, how small Izzie is, and that the smallest of the litter is now bigger than her? Should I be testing for different things, or is there a good chance that she is fine?
I talked to the "breeder" and found out the birth order size-
1.The smallest died, 2. Tinkerbell, 3. Izzie, 4. Junior, 5. Bronco, 6. Bella, then 7. Little Bear. (smallest to biggest)
Well I got in contact with the person that owns Tinkerbell because I thought if I could tell the vet and other ppl that the smallest of the litter is still smallest, they wouldn't be so concerned. But she is now at 4 lbs. Izzie is still 3.4 lbs, but she is pretty skinny. Is that okay? That the technical runt, or the 2nd runt, of the litter has now outgrown her? I don't know if Tinkerbell is overweight or anything though, so you never know about that. But the vet visit made me all freaked out, no one has ever raised concerns like that about Izzie.
I think that since the parents were just so different, dad was about 4 lbs and mom is about 6 lbs, that the pups in the litter are going to have a big variation in size. Since I got 2 opposite ends with the litter when it comes to size, the difference seems more drastic.
Mainly what I wanna know, is if this is okay and normal, how small Izzie is, and that the smallest of the litter is now bigger than her? Should I be testing for different things, or is there a good chance that she is fine?